Commentaires: pourquoi, comment?/Коментари: защо, как?

Ce blog a pour objectif de créer un débat d’idées à propos de l’actualité bulgare. En conséquence, les commentaires, à chaud comme à froid, sont les bienvenus. Que vous vouliez donner votre sentiment général sur “Vues de Sofia” ou que vous souhaitiez réagir aux articles que j’ai postés, vos avis m’intéressent fortement. A partir de là, seuls les commentaires faisant référence à des propos racistes, grossiers, insultants ou encore hors sujet seront indésirables.

Concernant les adresses mail que vous laissez, vérifiez bien qu’elles sont valides. En effet, c’est nécessaire afin que je puisse vous contacter personnellement en cas de modération de l’un de vos commentaires.

Enfin concernant l’anonymat, c’est vous qui êtes maîtres d’écrire votre vrai nom ou d’afficher un pseudonyme.

Bonne lecture et bonne écriture.

  1. guichard
    novembre 29th, 2009 at 14:18 | #1

    Bonjour,
    Je suis transporteur de voyageurs en France et je souhaiterai avoir un contact avec un transporteur en Bulgarie afin de passer un partenaria et enventuellement, développer une affaire là bas.
    Comment puis prndre des contact en Bulgarie?
    Merci de me tenir informé.
    Cordialement,
    Stéphane GUICHARD

  2. février 8th, 2010 at 16:48 | #2

    Attn: SE. M. Etienne de Poncins re: Environmental project for evaluation

    Dear Mr. de Poncins,

    My name is Ivaylo Avramov and I am writing you because of the recent speech of President Sarkozy in Davos regarding the capitalism. I share his words that we need to look beyond our own borders of competence and that we should connect our knowledge with the expertise of others in order to look for complex solutions! In this relation I’d like to introduce you one vision about how to tackle triple Environment-Energy-Economy crisis, as part of a bigger mechanism, and to hear your professional opinion (based on your expertise as politician) regarding its feasibility.

    Basics:
    1. We experience very heavy economic crisis affecting many types of business and millions of people.
    2. Many scientists conclude that the economic consequences from the worsening environmental situation resulting from climate change will be even heavier. For instance: the financial loses from just one hurricane are measured in hundreds of billions of dollars.
    3. Energy issue and its multiple aspects “weigh” more and more: growing needs, prices, abundance, political independence, degree of pollution, etc.

    Unprecedented situation requires unprecedented steps. In this relation, I would like to ask you kindly to consider the possibilities described in Desert Ice Project - http://www.deserticeproject.com

    There you will find a description of the project aimed to fight global warming (and related desertification / drought, food and water shortage, poverty, unemployment, illiteracy, illegal immigration, terror, violence and conflicts, etc.) by global, complex measures - global initiative / network of local focused solutions to specific regions.
    If the situation is so bad and even going worse, we must not exclude any alternative.

    The emphasis is on the belief that basically we can react to this knot of problems in two key ways:
    1. By intensive greening (more trees and leafs - more absorbed CO2, preserved moisture/WATER, more stable soil, more jobs, more own produced FOOD by the locals, more income and profits, more stable economies and more well living people, reduced migration, improved security, etc.). This step alone won’t help, because industrial pollution will go on.
    2. By sophisticated filtering and energy efficient systems radically reducing heat-trapping gases that flow in the atmosphere – all shaped in one international system of standards, which does not allow one to take unfair advantage compared to the others. Only limiting our greenhouse emissions (CCS techniques alone) won’t help, because desertification, drought, water/food shortage and following social problems will continue. So, there must be applied both methods.

    This is a large economic initiative that will mobilize many sectors of business - engineering, construction, banking, security, education, agriculture, science, etc. DIP includes large infrastructure projects, that will attract large contractors, and long chain of subcontractors; taking credits; reconsidering ideas that were underestimated so far. For instance: directing resources to “green” production, let say solar panels will open a lots of new jobs in this sector, and this will lower the prices, which will make these panels more accessible by more people. And then the government may oblige business and households for their massive usage - for every car / building roof, for every cell phone and laptop, etc.

    Unlike the geo-engineering projects this operation is the most natural one. It only reverses the “negative geo-engineering” that we already did to some places in our planet - deforestation, pollution, too much land used for grazing, etc. Many of its stages are applied already in different parts of the world. They just need to be connected in one system.

    Many requirements set by environmentalists seem to be too expensive from the economists’ point of view. And the opposite - what industry and business want is often unacceptable by the green. This project tries to find the crossing point between, and it should be assessed by both sides.

    We are almost 7 billion (mankind will pass this threshold at 2012), and except the 2 billion people that struggle every day for basics like water and food, the most of the rest try to live the movie version of the American way of life. Not to mention that we need 2 more planets like Earth to feed our consumer needs.

    Every problem is an opportunity in disguise. This is a chance for EU, not just for leading the world in solving the current triple E3 (Environment-Energy-Economy) crisis, but to put international relations / co-operation into a new level.

    I hope that this might be interesting for you from your perspective, and that the proposed measures could initiate a serious discussion at future climate/economic summits.

    Thank you for your time.
    Looking forwards to hearing from you.

    Sincerely,
    Ivaylo Avramov
    Sofia
    Bulgaria

    P.S. Latest (seemingly unrelated) news about the Wilkins ice shelf breaking off from the Antarctic Peninsula, giant iceberg drifting nearby Australia, record temperature extremes (freezing cold in Europe and incinerating heat in Australia and South America), rising unemployment rates, the concentration of economic interests (military presence) around both polar areas, and the insecurity of Food/Energy/other resources’ prices, reminds us that we are running out of time.

  3. georges indjiev
    février 9th, 2010 at 18:47 | #3

    Уважаеми господин плосланик,

    Пиша Ви на Български защото сте в България и като дипломат Вие би трябвало
    да знаете Български език,ако бяхте във Франция щях да Ви пиша на Френски.

    Позволявам си да Ви обърна внимание,че като дипломат не е редно да оказвате
    натиск върху българската съдебна система.

    Вашите колеги колеги от други страни не си позволяват такова нещо.

    Наистина е за съжаление дипломат да се бърка в вътрешните работи
    на друга държава.

    С уважение,

    Георги Инджиев

    София България

    0888 371 908

  4. boris
    février 9th, 2010 at 19:15 | #4

    Monsieur l’ambassadeur,

    j’ai été agréablement surpris de découvrir l’existence de ce blog qui bouscule l’image parfois un peu figée que l’on se fait de la communication du Quai d’Orsay. J’ai lu avec beaucoup d’intérêt l’article traitant de la commissaire bulgare pressentie pour occuper un siège à la commission qui a été recalée par le Parlement. l’analyse de recherche d’un bouc émissaire semble pertinente tout comme la relative vulnérabilité, a priori, de la candidate Bulgare. Est ce que le gouvernement Bulgare n’aurait pas cherché, un peu cyniquement, à se débarrasser ainsi d’une politicienne atypique ? c’est une spéculation gratuite que je mets au conditionnel, bien entendu.

    Ce blog incarne le visage numérique d’une diplomatie qui choisit de communiquer, y compris sur des sujets pièges, et cette audace, même mesurée, me plait beaucoup. J’espère que l’idée d’un blog dédié à une communication qui ne reste pas seulement institutionnelle, mais moderne et dynamique, fera école dans d’autres Ambassades où l’obligation de réserve me semble parfois appliquée avec trop de zèle/

    Avec toutes mes félicitations

    Boris Faure
    Varsovie - Institut français

  5. Iskra Bankova
    mars 1st, 2010 at 23:13 | #5

    Ваше Превъзходителство,
    ВЪРНЕТЕ ДЕЦАТА НА ПАВЕЛ ОТ СТРАСБУРГ!!! ТОВА Е НЕВЕРОЯТЕН ФАШИЗЪМ, НИКОГА НЯМА ДА ИМАМ ЗА ФРАНЦИЯ СЪЩОТО МНЕНИЕ СЛЕД ТОЗИ РЕПОРТАЖ!!!!!!!! ПОТРЕСЕНА СЪМ, ЧЕ НЕ ДАВАТЕ НА ДЕЦАТА НА ТЕЗИ ПРЕКРАСНИ, ОБРАЗОВАНИ И ЧЕСТНИ БЪЛГАРИ ДА ГОВОРЯТ БЪЛГАРСКИ ЕЗИК!!!КАК МОЖЕ ДА СЪЩЕСТВУВА ТАКОВА ОТНОШЕНИЕ КЪМ ХОРА В ЕВРОПА, ТОВА Е ПО-СТРАШНО ОТ ВСЯКА МИЗЕРИЯ ТУК, ТОВА Е ОСЪЩЕСТВЕН ОРУЕЛ НА ЖИВО ВЪВ ФРАНЦИЯ.КАК МОЖЕ ПРИ ЖИВИ РОДИТЕЛИ ДА НЕ ДАВАТЕ НА ДЕЦАТА ИМ ДА ГИ ВИЖДАТ, ЧУВАТ И ГОВОРЯТ НА РОДНИЯ ИМ ЕЗИК!!! ТАКОВА ПОСЕГАТЕЛСТВО КЪМ СОБСТВЕНИТЕ ДЕЦА НЕ СА ПРАВИЛИ И ТУРЦИТЕ ПО ВРЕМЕ НА ТУРСКОТО РОБСТВО В БЪЛГАРИЯ!
    ПОТРЕСЕНА СЪМ, НЯМАМ ДУМИ!!!
    ИСКРА БАНКОВА ЖУРНАЛИСТКА

  6. ABIABOUTTI Michel Rodriguez
    avril 16th, 2010 at 11:22 | #6

    Je suis un ancien étudiant en faculté de journalisme université de sofia année 1990.Je souhaite énormément rentrer en contact avec cette faculté.Pouvez vous m\’aider à me donnant l\’adresse exacte?

  1. No trackbacks yet.
Security Code: